ANAKO
All lessons are free. Sign in only if you want to save progress, quiz scores and XP.Sign in free and save progress
  1. ANAKO /
  2. ANAKO Academy /
  3. Smart Money Concepts /
  4. Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL
← BackSmart Money Concepts

Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL

Learning goal: Identify obvious stop clusters without requiring tick-perfect equality.

1Learn

Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL

EQH/EQL are several same-degree swings near one level that create an obvious stop and breakout area.

How to identify it

EQH/EQL are several same-degree swings near one level that create an obvious stop and breakout area.

Equality is normally a zone, not one exact tick. Visibility may attract attention, but neither pool size nor reaction timing is known.

How it works, step by step

Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.

The source logic is: Equality is normally a zone, not one exact tick. Visibility may attract attention, but neither pool size nor reaction timing is known.

Separate observation from interpretation: the numbers show only a price path; an SMC label still needs this lesson’s criteria. 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7

Why it matters

Its practical importance is that They are the source’s primary training example for liquidity pools.

Place in the SMC sequence

They are the source’s primary training example for liquidity pools.

How it works, step by step

  1. First, Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  2. Then, Valid case: Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  3. Finally, Invalid case: EQH/EQL identify liquidity; they do not guarantee reversal.
  4. Define invalidation before turning an observation into a trade.

How to identify it

  1. Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  2. Valid case: Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  3. Invalid case: EQH/EQL identify liquidity; they do not guarantee reversal.
  4. After the observation, wait for subsequent behavior to confirm it.

Distinction from a related concept

Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL

EQH/EQL are several same-degree swings near one level that create an obvious stop and breakout area.

Certain double top/bottom

EQH/EQL identify liquidity; they do not guarantee reversal.

Two directional scenarios

↗ Supported case

980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7: Valid case: Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone. In a bullish scenario, Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.

↘ Interpretation trap

980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7: Invalid case: EQH/EQL identify liquidity; they do not guarantee reversal. In a bearish scenario, Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.

⚠ Common mistakes

  • First error: labeling without criteria in Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL
  • Second error: confusing it with Certain double top/bottom
  • Third error: turning an observation into an immediate entry without a model or risk control.

✓ Practical checklist

  • Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  • Valid case: Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone.
  • Invalid case: EQH/EQL identify liquidity; they do not guarantee reversal.
  • This concept is not a guaranteed entry or profit; stop, position size and model rules remain mandatory.
2See an example

Guided exercise · 1

Guided: split the sequence into observable events and write only evidence actually present in the data. 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7

3Practice

Practice

Guided practice

Guided: split the sequence into observable events and write only evidence actually present in the data. 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7

?↔✓

Gold V3 Open Response

💡 The emphasized element is a clue; still submit the answer yourself. Mark two or more same-degree nearby reactions as a zone. Separate observation from interpretation: the numbers show only a price path; an SMC label still needs this lesson’s criteria.

Expected answer

جفت اول و سوم؛ جفت دوم فاصله بسیار بیشتری دارد.

Assisted practice

Assisted: write one supported and one rushed interpretation of the same sequence, then state the filter that rejects the weak reading. 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7

?↔✓

Gold V3 Open Response

Expected answer

پاسخ باید هر سه معیار را پوشش دهد.

Independent practice

Independent: before seeing continuation, record the likely reading, required confirmation and invalidation on three separate lines. 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7

?↔✓

Gold V3 Open Response

Expected answer

پاسخ نموداری؛ Zone باید High/Lowهای نزدیک را پوشش دهد.

4Test yourself

Knowledge check

For the sequence 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7, which statement is most precise?
If price does not confirm the reading after 980.2 → 1001.0 → 987.4 → 1000.7, what should happen?
Before using Equal Highs / Equal Lows — EQH/EQL in a live decision, what must already be defined?
+35 XPLesson resultContinue to course map →

What to retain

  • Its practical importance is that They are the source’s primary training example for liquidity pools.
  • They are the source’s primary training example for liquidity pools.
  • Mental model: observe → label conditionally → wait for subsequent behavior → decide only inside a risk plan.

Educational content only — not financial advice and no guarantee of profit.